Objective: Surgical resection of seizure?producing brain tissue is a gold standard treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. However, several patient-specific factors can preclude resective surgery, including a spatially extensive (“regional”) seizure?onset zone (SOZ). For such patients, responsive neurostimulation (RNS) represents a potential treatment, but its efficacy has not been investigated in this population.

Methods: The research team performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients (N = 30) with drug-resistant focal epilepsy and a regional neocortical SOZ delineated by intracranial monitoring who were treated with the RNS System for at least 6 months. RNS System leads were placed at least 1-cm apart over the SOZ, and most patients were treated with a lead-to-lead stimulation pathway. Five patients underwent partial resection of the SOZ concurrent with RNS System implantation. The team assessed change in seizure frequency relative to preimplant baseline and evaluated correlation between clinical outcome and stimulation parameters.

Results: Median follow-up duration was 21.5 months (range 6-52). Median reduction in clinical seizure frequency was 75.5% (interquartile range [IQR] 40%-93.9%). There was no significant difference in outcome between patients treated with and without concurrent partial resection. Most patients were treated with low charge densities, but charge density, interlead distance, and duration of treatment were not significantly correlated with outcome.

Significance: RNS is a feasible and effective treatment in patients with drug-resistant regional neocortical seizures. Prospective studies in larger cohorts are necessary to determine optimal lead configuration and stimulation parameters, although our results suggest that lead-to-lead stimulation and low charge density may be effective in some patients.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, adverse events and expense burden of outpatient versus remote programming for vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in children with epilepsy.

A total of 46 children with drug-resistant epilepsy, who underwent VNS at the Pediatric Epilepsy Center, Peking University First Hospital between March 2017 and June 2018, were enrolled into the study. Participants were assigned (non-randomized) into an outpatient programming group or remote programming group (where VNS parameters were adjusted through the internet) by parental choice. The responder rate, expenditure for VNS programming and adverse events were compared between the two groups. The median age at VNS implantation was 5.17 years (3.83-6.71), with the median epileptic course being 3.79 years (2.65-4.90). Twenty-four patients were assigned to the outpatient programming group and 22 were assigned to the remote programming group. Baseline data were comparable between the two groups, with the exception of the remote group having a longer distance between their place of residence and the hospital. The median time from VNS implantation to last follow-up was 1.33 years (1.25-1.75) and 1.46 years (1.17-1.58) in the outpatient and remote groups, respectively. In the outpatient programming group, 15 patients (62.5 %,) were VNS responders and four patients (16.6 %) became seizure-free. In the remote programming group, 16 patients (72.7 %) were VNS responders and four (17.4 %) became seizure-free. Cough and hoarseness were common adverse events in both the outpatient and remote groups (33.3 % vs. 18.2 %). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of adverse events.

The median cost of each follow-up visit per patient in the outpatient group was 192.4 US dollars ($120.0-$376.5), of which travelling expenses were the major component, followed by accommodation fees, outpatient service fees and indirect costs. Whereas, patients in the remote programming group only needed to pay for the remote programming expense, which totaled 75.8 US dollars per person each time. The efficacy and adverse events were both comparable between the outpatient and remote programming patients. Remote programming was found to be a more cost-effective treatment, especially for patients living further away from centers specializing in epilepsy.

SK Life Science, Inc., announced that the FDA has accepted its investigational new drug (IND) application for SKL24741, for the treatment of epilepsy. SK life science will launch a Phase 1 clinical trial for SKL24741 in 2020.

While the exact mechanism of action is not yet fully understood, the antiepileptic effects of SKL24741 may result from its ability to reduce excitatory nerve activity by inhibiting voltage-gated sodium channels, which helps slow or stop misfiring of the brain’s electrical system that causes seizures. A range of in vitro studies have suggested that SKL24741 has higher affinity for the inactivated phase of these sodium channels, potentially allowing selective targeting of the pathological conditions of epilepsy. Preclinical in vivo studies have demonstrated efficacy in a variety of animal seizure models.

There are three treatment options commonly used by doctors in the emergency room to treat patients with refractory status epilepticus, severe seizures that continue even after benzodiazepine medications, which are effective in controlling seizures in more than two-thirds of patients. New findings published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveal that the three drugs, levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, and valproate, are equally safe and effective in treating patients with this condition. The study was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), part of the National Institutes of Health.

“Doctors can be confident that the particular treatment they choose for their patients with status epilepticus is safe and effective and may help them avoid the need to intubate the patient as well as stays in the intensive care unit,” said Robin Conwit, M.D., NINDS program director and an author of the study. “This was a truly collaborative, multidisciplinary study that involved pediatricians, emergency medicine doctors, neurologists, pharmacologists, and biostatisticians all contributing their expertise.”

In the Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT), led by Robert Silbergleit, MD, professor at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Jordan Elm, PhD, professor at Medical University of South Carolina; James Chamberlain, MD, professor at George Washington University; and Jaideep Kapur, MB, BS, PhD., professor at the University of Virginia, more than 380 children and adults were randomized to receive levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, or valproate when they came to the emergency room experiencing a seizure. The researchers were trying to determine which of the anticonvulsant drugs was most effective in stopping seizures and improving a patient’s level of responsiveness within 60 minutes of administering treatment.

The results showed that the three drugs stopped seizures and improved responsiveness in approximately half of the study participants. Specifically, these benefits were seen in 47% of subjects in the levetiracetam group, in 45% of participants in the fosphenytoin group and in 46% of subjects in the valproate group. These differences were not statistically significant.

There were no differences in serious side effects among the drugs.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved 11/21/2019 XCOPRI (cenobamate tablets) to treat partial-onset seizures in adults.

“XCOPRI is a new option to treat adults with partial-onset seizures, which is an often difficult-to-control condition that can have a significant impact on patient quality of life,” said Billy Dunn, M.D., director of the Office of Neuroscience in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “Patients can have different responses to the various seizure medicines that are available. This approval provides an additional needed treatment option for people with this condition.”

A seizure is a usually short episode of abnormal electrical activity in the brain. Seizures can cause uncontrolled movements, abnormal thinking or behavior, and abnormal sensations. Movements can be violent, and changes in consciousness can occur. Seizures occur when clusters of nerve cells (neurons) in the brain undergo uncontrolled activation. A partial-onset seizure begins in a limited area of the brain.